The annual conference of the IxDA (Interaction Design Association) was held in Toronto this year. I was browsing tweets streaming with the hashtag #IxD13. Quotables displayed from presentations. One such item was tweeted by Designer Carl Duffield:
An eloquent statement, which I wanted to RT (retweet), but wasn’t sure who said it: Carl himself or someone else? I reached out to Carl, who kindly and generously mined the source. The quote was from the presentation Setting Course – Design Research to Experience Roadmap by Brian Winters and Jason Ulaszek of Manifest Digital in Chicago.
I commend Carl for not dismissing the quote’s credit and taking the time to locate the source—long after his tweet’s publication in the Twitterverse. As he put it in our email exchange: “Lesson definitely learned to pull together my notes (where things were actually attributed) into my tweets.”
Attribution is a very big deal, not only within the context of interaction design, but all disciplines. Conferences—IxD, TED, et al.—are a particular wellspring in which attribution can be practiced. Because it takes work, attribution doesn’t align to the instant impulse of tweeting. While properly acknowledging who said what or what was made does affect timing, it doesn’t make what was shared less timely. All the more reason to be mindful of the originator, who provided the tweetable moment in the first place. This is why I admire initiatives like The Curator’s Code by Maria Popova of Brain Pickings, who said it well: “Keep the rabbit hole of the Internet open by honoring discovery.”
• • •
Related: Design Feast uses The Curator’s Code. Read the past blog post about using it in tweets.